Grand Canyon, Colorado River Flows - August and September
This is a August 16, 2018, update from Paul Davidson at Glen Canyon Dam.
The release volume from Glen Canyon Dam for August, 2018, will be 900,000 acre-feet. Hourly releases during August are anticipated to fluctuate between approximately 10,180 cfs in the nighttime and 15,180 cfs in the daytime. On weekend days in August releases will be steady near 11,500 cfs. Additionally, in August, the LTEMP Bug Flow experimental fluctuation pattern will occur as described below.
The anticipated release volume for September, 2018, is 670,000 acre-feet with daily fluctuations between approximately 7,600 cfs and 13,645 cfs.
The expected release volume for October, 2018, is 625,000 acre-feet.
Please note, the monthly volumes for August is set, the Bug Flow experiment does not change monthly or weekly volumes.
(GCPBA note - Read about "Bug Flow" here: The Bugflow Experiment).
The Bug Flow experiment consists of steady weekend releases from Glen Canyon Dam and normal fluctuating releases during the weekdays. The steady weekend flows are expected to provide favorable conditions for insects to lay eggs along the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam, while the minimum flows on weekdays are designed to be similar to flows on the weekends, thus preventing the eggs from drying out. Performing this experiment will not affect the Monthly or Weekly planned release volumes. The affect will only be to the daily distribution volumes, and the peak and low daily flow rates.
Paul Davidson, Hydraulic Engineer, Glen Canyon Dam
Bureau of Reclamation 125 S. State St. Salt Lake City, UT 84138 Ph: 801-524-3642
GCPBA RiverNews 7/3/2018 – Hualapai Reverse Decision To Issue Citations
GCPBA has been reporting on the intent of the Hualapai Nation to require Grand Canyon river runners buy permits to be on land along the left side of the Colorado River from river miles 164.5 to 287. The Hualapai claim the land as theirs. The National Park Service disputes that claim.
Read about it here: Hualapai Land & River Access Permits Followup
The NPS has a different interpretation of the location of the boundary between U.S. and Hualapai land, claiming the boundary is at the historic high water mark from before Glen Canyon Dam was built.
We have been in contact with the Hualapai, and with Grand Canyon National Park, about their plans to require permits for camping and hiking in that area and to issue citations from July 9 to 13 to river runners who access that land without a Hualapai permit.
Today, July 3, we received the following email from the NPS:
"The Hualapai Tribe has recently issued a public notice regarding its requirements for a Hualapai River Access Permit to allow hiking or camping on Hualapai Tribal lands while on a river trip through Grand Canyon National Park. The Tribe has also announced its intention to conduct patrols related to these permit requirements.
"The NPS supports the Hualapai Tribe's authority to enforce its boundary and manage its tribal lands above the historic high water mark. However, the NPS maintains its position that below the high water mark is National Park Service land.
"We are in communication with the Hualapai Tribe on this issue."
Fourteen minutes later, this email arrived from the NPS:
"The Hualapai Tribe just informed us that they would not be doing any permit checks the week of July 9th."
There was no comment regarding the boundary dispute. It remains an issue for future resolution.
GCPBA appreciates the communication between the NPS and the Hualapai Nation to discuss and work out the issues of the land boundary and Hualapai land access permits. We will continue to discuss this with GCNP.
GCPBA RiverNews 6/27/2018 - Hualapai Land & River Access Permits Followup
As you may recall, two weeks ago GCPBA reported that the Hualapai Tribe is trying to institute a permit fee of $100 on river runners for using river left from mile 168 down to mile 287. (Read our RiverNews that announced this here: Hualapai Land & River Access Permits/). They are also planning on doing enforcement patrols using Hualapai Fish and Game law enforcement officers to make contact with river runners between July 9 and July 13 to ensure the permits are purchased.
GCPBA wants to make it abundantly clear that we disagree with this action. We believe that it is in violation of Grand Canyon National Park boundaries and provisions of the 2006 Colorado River Management Plan that the Hualapai were involved in forming. We have sent a letter to GCNP Superintendent Chris Lehnertz regarding this issue, asking for any information or clarification the Park can provide.
Read our full report here: Hualapai Land & River Access Permits Followup
GCPBA RiverNews 6/10/2018 - Hualapai Land & River Access Permits
The Hualapai Game and Fish Department sent out the following notice on June 4th:
Public Notice: Hualapai River Access Permit Checks Upstream Of Diamond Creek (RM225)
The Hualapai Tribe will be conducting river access permits the week of July 9, 2018 through July 13, 2018 on the Colorado River upstream of Diamond Creek. Hualapai Tribal boundaries began (sic) at RM 164.5 to RM 287 river left.
Read our full report here: Hualapai Land & River Access Permits
GCPBA President's Letter - December 2017
Greetings All, Time to catch up on what's been happening......
Click the link below to read our President's Letter containing an update of various topics: The Navajo Council's vote against the Escalade development, our complaint with Grand Canyon National Park regarding the Hualapai River Runners doing an upriver run, and the resumption of river patrols by the NPS.
GCPBA RiverNews 7/16/2017 - Hualapai Nation Announce Intent to Require Permits for Camping
Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent Chris Lehnertz held a Community Conversation on July 11 in Flagstaff, Arizona. Among various topics discussed was Hualapai Nation Chairman Damon Clarke announcing their intent to require permits for river runners to camp on Hualapai land from miles 164.5 and 273.5.
Read our full announcement here: Community Conversation Recap, Hualapai Intent of Camping Permits
GCPBA RiverNews 3/27/2017 - Grand Canyon Noncommercial River Trip Regulations Are Updated
Grand Canyon National Park recently updated their noncommercial river trip regulations. The new regulations are dated March 9, 2017. River runners are required by the Park to have a printed copy of the regulations with them at all times.
Read the rest of our announcement here: Grand Canyon Noncommercial River Trip Regulations
GCPBA RiverNews 1/15/17 - Stow Away Motors For Diamond Down Allowed Again!
Read our announcement here: Stow Away Motors For Diamond Down Allowed Again
GCPBA RiverNews 11/6/15 - Unused Grand Canyon Noncommercial Launch Dates Are Rescheduled, Not Lost
Read the rest of our announcement here: Unused Noncommercial Launch Dates Are Rescheduled, Not Lost
GCPBA RiverNews 12/2/14 – Martin Litton, February 13, 1917 – November 30, 2014
Read the entire RiverNews about Martin Litton’s passing here: Martin Litton, deceased at age 97
GCPBA President's Report - October, 2014
Wally Rist, GCPBA President, has his President's Report posted here on our website:
There is a lot of information in it, including reports of meetings with Grand Canyon National Park officials Superintendent Dave Uberuaga, River Permits Program Manager Steve Sullivan, and Chief River District Ranger Brian Bloom.
GCPBA Adaptive Management Considerations Meeting Follow Up
October 24, 2014
Permits Manager, Steve Sullivan
River District Ranger, Brian Bloom
Wilderness Planner, Linda Jalbert
CC: Superintendent, Dave Uberuaga
Grand Canyon National Park
P.O. Box 129
Grand Canyon, AZ 86023
Re: GCPBA Adaptive Management Considerations Meeting, Friday, October 3, 2014
Dear Steve, Brian, and Linda,
Thank you for meeting with us. We appreciate your dedication and the frank and thorough discussion of the Adaptive Management Consideration paper we had previously submitted. The meeting was very productive. I think we learned a lot from each other.
Your prompt implementation of posting up-coming lottery dates on your lottery site(our R-1, recommendation) is being well received. People are able to get a jump-start with their planning. That along with our new trip passenger exchange list https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/gc_river_trip_planning/info (which we are hoping you will also post on your web site) should help in utilizing some of these last minute trip opportunities. It’s a good example of GCPBA/GCNP collaboration and cooperation to achieve something positive.
It was our impression that you would give further consideration to our discussion item D-5, adding a few small trip launches in March and October. In that vein you were going to send us the TAOTs for the different seasons and/or the criteria used as the guiding principles for river use during those seasons. We look forward to getting this information so that we can further explore this concept with you.
You mentioned you still had concerns about our discussion item D-6, which is closely related to the exceeding of TAOTS (60) in early May and results from the shorter trips over taking the longer ones. If we understood correctly, you felt there were only two options to alleviate this situation. The first was a few shorter trips in April swapped for some longer trips in early September, as previously considered publicly. The second was the elimination of, say 3 late spring trips with the addition of 3 trips in early September. As you know, the trip length swap concept was not well received by a number of boaters. Our initial reaction to the 3 trip swap was that it too would probably not be well received by a number of boaters. We did give both alternatives considerable consideration at our board meeting and concluded that neither option would not be well received by some sectors. Neither was less unappealing. We will give it further consideration as, I am sure you will as well. We of course realize that this is an issue where no solution will be without vocal objections.
We liked your “front loading” concept as a method to fill unused trips. Further discussion at our board meeting confirmed that we would support its implementation.
The possibility of allowing someone to appear as a PATL on someone’s application as well as applying for his own permit met with mixed opinions. We could not reach a conclusion on its overall benefit. We will give it further consideration as well.
Again, thank you for working with us. We look forward to hearing from you soon. As always, please do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions or thoughts to share, or if there is some way GCPBA can be of help.
GCPBA sends Colorado River Management Plan Adaptive Management Considerations to the Park
In May, we asked GCPBA members for feedback about various aspects of the CRMP, and subsequently put a similar query out on our GCPBA Yahoo Group and in several other internet locations.
The feedback obtained from that project was distilled and included in the first of a series of recommendations and discussion items we intend to present to the Park. Two recommendations for CRMP modifications and six discussion items were presented August, 2014, for the Park's consideration. We intend to discuss these with park personnel at our regular meeting with them in October in Flagstaff. Those discussions could possibly result in recommendations for additional implementation items in the future.
The full text of the GCPBA presentation is here, as a .pdf file for saving or printing: GCPBA CRMP Adaptive Management Considerations
The text of the presentation can be viewed on our website here: Presentation text
A brief list of our points is below. Please read the full document for our supporting background information.
While the response period for that project is officially over, the Board would certainly welcome your additional comments now. Write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org
R-1. Expedite reallocation of unclaimed and abandoned launch dates. This would be done by announcing information regarding those dates immediately upon availability, so that boaters can begin exploratory planning before lotteries are actually conducted. In this connection, more frequent secondary lotteries should be considered for unclaimed launch dates. (See Appendix item #2)
R-2. Increase maximum trip lengths for selected portions of the boating season. Under this revision, winter trip lengths would be restored to 30 days. (See Appendix item #6)
D-1. Consider changes in the One Trip a Year rule, to include: waiving it completely; waiving it just for the winter months; or, waiving it only for trips that are unassigned within 30 days of launch. (See Appendix item #1)
D-2. Consider changing how lottery chances are awarded, to develop a new system in which everyone would start with one point. In such a system, additional chances would be awarded only for a failed lottery application (and no trip participation) each year. Under this provision, the lottery chances of the applicant and PATL could be added. (See Appendix item #3, 4)
D-3. Consider increasing trip sizes, such that up to 24 participants would be allowed for winter and shoulder season launches. (See Appendix item #5)
D-4. Consider rescheduling unused launches in a manner that recovers lapsed launches later in the same year. (See Appendix item #8)
D-5. Consider revision of the small trip launch schedule. This idea would entail a reduction in the number of winter launches, which would be replaced by a corresponding number of additional launches in March and October. (See Appendix item #9)
D-6. Consider increasing the maximum trip length for a noncommercial standard river trip launched in the period Sept 1-15 from 18 days to 21. (Appendix item #7)
GCPBA Could Use Your Help - Help Us Help You
A reminder that GCPBA's fund-raising effort is still active. It's vitally important in helping us to stay in the arena when it comes to representing private boater interests. The three key areas where the Board anticipates a coming need for additional financial support are:
* The Long Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) for operation of Glen Canyon Dam, which in its final form will have a major impact on river related recreational opportunities on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon.
* The proposed LCR Escalade development, which (if not stopped) would result in an extensive resort-type development on the rim, a tramway to the river, and a restaurant literally overlooking the junction of the LCR and the main Colorado, as well as the potential for reduced or no access to the Little Colorado River Canyon for river runners.
* The Backcountry Management Plan now under development by the Park, which interfaces with river operations in important ways like closures (such as happened at Deer Creek) and impact of the increasingly popular sport of packrafting.
For those of you who have already donated, joined GCPBA, or renewed your membership, thank you for your generosity and support.
For folks who are new here, or who in the past have stayed on the sidelines, please help GCPBA through your paid membership, membership renewal, or a direct donation. Visit our new website: www.gcpba.org and look for the "Donate" link on the left side.
Thanks for your support.
Welcome to the Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association NEW Website!
Our Goal: Ensure the ability for all to obtain, on an equal and timely basis, an opportunity to experience a float trip through the Grand Canyon while protecting the resource.
The Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association was established in 1996 to provide the self-outfitted boating public with an advocate and a clear voice seeking to achieve fair access for the non-commercial river runner in Grand Canyon and the rivers of the Colorado Plateau region.
Important note to previous GCPBA website registrants - your previous username will still work on this new site but your password may not. If it doesn't work, you will be taken to a page allowing you to request a new password that will be emailed to you. Once you are able to log in, you can change your password if you desire. We're sorry for the inconvenience - building a new website is as challenging as running a heavy boat through Bedrock at low, low water.